Powered by Decidian Intelligence
Simulated business data | Decidian intelligence demonstration DEMONSTRATION MODE — SAVED RESULTS
Executive recommendations
What leadership could consider doing
Figures are app calculations from the simulated records and current assumptions (net opportunity $1.15M). Wording is saved demonstration content — not Decidian Intelligence output. No proprietary scores or confidence percentages are shown.
Recommendation 1 · Immediate
Enforce change orders on unbilled scope work
- Financial impact Calc
- Stops up to $420,000 of annual delivery cost; $290,250 revenue potentially recoverable
- Investment required Calc
- Process change and reporting; minimal cash
- Risk
- Client friction on accounts used to free extra work
- Evidence
- CL-0016, CL-0003, CL-0124, CL-0055, CL-0037, CL-0086…
- Uncertainty
- How much of the gap is inefficiency rather than scope
- Stress-test result Calc
- Measured cost; result does not depend on market scenario
- Executive priority
- Immediate — the largest leak and fully within management control
- Action plan
- Notify account managers of the new approval rule
- Issue change orders on the 7 accounts with clauses
- Track contracted vs. actual hours monthly
Recommendation 2 · Immediate
Cancel overlapping software and unused seats
- Financial impact Calc
- $81,600 modeled annual saving
- Investment required Calc
- Migration effort for overlapping tools
- Risk
- Teams lose preferred tools
- Evidence
- SW-01, SW-02, SW-03, SW-04, SW-05, SW-06, SW-07, SW-08, SW-09, SW-11
- Uncertainty
- Contract termination dates
- Stress-test result Calc
- Unaffected by downside scenarios
- Executive priority
- Immediate — quick win
- Action plan
- Confirm seat owners
- Consolidate project management and SEO tools
- Right-size renewals
Recommendation 3 · High
Adopt Strategy B (profitability first) before scaling acquisition
- Financial impact Calc
- First-year operating profit $280K; run-rate $979K
- Investment required Calc
- $250,000
- Risk
- Slower near-term revenue growth; customer resistance to contract changes
- Evidence
- Leakage findings LK-1, LK-3, LK-4, LK-5; legacy contracts
- Uncertainty
- Client price sensitivity; recovery rates
- Stress-test result Calc
- Severe case first-year: $238K
- Executive priority
- High — sets the path for the year
- Action plan
- Quarter 1: leakage controls
- Quarter 2: pilot price changes
- Quarter 3: review growth spending
Recommendation 4 · Medium
Phase into Strategy C once leakage controls are working
- Financial impact Calc
- First-year $60K; run-rate $458K
- Investment required Calc
- $145,000
- Risk
- Execution complexity: two programs run at once
- Evidence
- Campaign conversion records MK-1 to MK-6
- Uncertainty
- Acquisition cost in the next two quarters
- Stress-test result Calc
- Severe case first-year: $8,795
- Executive priority
- Medium — after Q1 results
- Action plan
- Reallocate Display and Events spend first
- Scale only channels with measured conversion
Recommendation 5 · High
Escalate 90+ day receivables
- Financial impact Calc
- $48,000 expected loss; $680,000 cash tied up (cash, not profit)
- Investment required Calc
- Finance team time
- Risk
- Relationship strain with slow-paying clients
- Evidence
- AR-001, AR-002, AR-003, AR-004, AR-005, AR-006…
- Uncertainty
- Disputed vs. simply late invoices
- Stress-test result Calc
- Severe client losses would raise write-off risk
- Executive priority
- High — losses grow with age
- Action plan
- Call all 90+ day accounts this week
- Introduce payment terms in renewals