Simulated business data | Decidian intelligence demonstration DEMONSTRATION MODE — SAVED RESULTS

Start Big Leap demo Big Leap ERP view Connection Evidence Explorer Owner decisions

Decidian financial intelligence · Simulated data

Show me how Decidian found this

DEC-FIN-002 · COST SAVINGS

Simulated demonstration data

Vendor charges may not match contract terms

Decision: Do invoice line items agree with approved contracts?

Financial impact

$62,000

Annualized

Evidence

Additional Verification Needed

12 source records

Recommendation

Verify contract amendments, taxes and additional services, then request corrections or credits where justified.

Assumptions, risks & what would change the recommendation

Assumptions

Fictional records are internally consistent; validate real contracts and usage before acting

Key risks

Contract interpretation
Vendor disputes
Administrative costs
Service continuity

Would change it

An approved additional-service order could explain the difference
Verify whether a tier upgrade was authorized
Volume-related fees and taxes need separate verification
Check the effective date of the service termination

Stress-test this decision Full evidence

A · The Discovery · Original Finding

$62,000

Cost savings · Annualized

SIMULATED DEMONSTRATIONAdditional Verification Needed

Finding ID: DEC-FIN-002
Dataset version: BL-DEMO-2026-10-V1
Analysis timestamp · UTC: 2026-10-28T18:10:00Z
Calculation version: BL-FIN-V1

Contracts · Accounts payable · Payment history

The Business Question

Do invoice line items agree with approved contracts?

B · What the ERP Shows

Accounts payable

Invoices paid

Contracts

Negotiated rates approved

Payment history

Recurring payments continue

C · What Decidian Connects

Contract clausesInvoice line itemsPayment historyAnnualized differences

12 fictional source records · stable identifiers

View detailed evidence

Record ID	Source system	Original values
VCT-NS-01	Contracts	vendor: Northstar Media Systems contracted Monthly: 4,500 clause: Section 3.1: monthly managed media fee $4,500; extras require approval
INV-2048	Accounts payable	vendor: Northstar Media Systems period: 2026-09 invoiced Monthly: 5,250 contracted Monthly: 4,500 monthly Difference: 750
PAY-BC-01	Payment history	paid Months: 6 monthly Paid: 5,250
VCT-PS-02	Contracts	vendor: Peregrine Support Services contracted Monthly: 6,000 clause: Section 4: negotiated support tier $6,000 monthly
INV-2053	Accounts payable	vendor: Peregrine Support Services period: 2026-09 invoiced Monthly: 8,000 contracted Monthly: 6,000 monthly Difference: 2,000
PAY-BC-02	Payment history	paid Months: 4 monthly Paid: 8,000
VCT-CP-03	Contracts	vendor: Cedar Payment Network contracted Monthly: 4,000 clause: Schedule B: processing service $4,000 monthly with agreed discounts
INV-2061	Accounts payable	vendor: Cedar Payment Network period: 2026-09 invoiced Monthly: 5,500 contracted Monthly: 4,000 monthly Difference: 1,500
PAY-BC-03	Payment history	paid Months: 3 monthly Paid: 5,500
VCT-ES-04	Contracts	vendor: Elm Service Agreements contracted Monthly: 2,000 clause: Section 2: discontinued service excluded; monthly fee $2,000
INV-2070	Accounts payable	vendor: Elm Service Agreements period: 2026-09 invoiced Monthly: 2,916.67 contracted Monthly: 2,000 monthly Difference: 916.67
PAY-BC-04	Payment history	paid Months: 2 monthly Paid: 2,916.67

D · What Decidian Discovers

Four recurring invoice differences require review. They are not automatically confirmed overbilling.

Additional Verification Needed

E · Financial Calculation

$62,000

Cost savings · Annualized

Σ (monthly invoice − contracted monthly rate) × 12 = 62000. Northstar: (5250 − 4500) × 12 = 9000. Historical potential credits = Σ difference × paid months = 18833.333333333332; separate, not added to annual savings.

Baseline decision: Implement targeted improvement

Implementation: $20,000

Modeled first-year net benefit: $12,550

Ongoing annualized benefit: $43,400

Original financial impact is not itself a guaranteed net benefit. Timing, realization and implementation are modeled separately.

Assumptions

Fictional records are internally consistent; validate real contracts and usage before acting

F · Recommendation

Verify contract amendments, taxes and additional services, then request corrections or credits where justified.

G · Risks and Trade-Offs

Contract interpretation
Vendor disputes
Administrative costs
Service continuity

What Could Change This Conclusion?

An approved additional-service order could explain the difference
Verify whether a tier upgrade was authorized
Volume-related fees and taxes need separate verification
Check the effective date of the service termination

H · Next Decision

TEST THIS DECISION

Optional review sends these fictional records to the existing Decidian connection; it may take 1–2 minutes.

All findings

Three departments are paying for overlapping software Vendor charges may not match contract terms Technology spending is growing faster than usage Additional client work is reducing profitability Strong campaign metrics can hide low-profit customers Revenue growth is not translating into cash at the same rate Revenue growth is masking declining profitability Renewal timing can lock in unnecessary cost Sales growth forecasts conflict with delivery capacity Active accounts can still need retention attention High-intent leads have slower follow-up Underperforming client contracts Software & vendor waste Sales-to-operations misalignment Delayed collections Contract pricing optimization Improved sales conversion Client retention improvements Resource utilization improvements

Money you could save

$286K

Gross avoidable annual expenses before timing and costs

Money you may be losing

$420K

Unbilled delivery-cost exposure, within $780K total leakage

Money you could make

$1.24M

Gross existing financial opportunities before overlap and realization

Money at risk

$840K

Annual contract revenue exposed, not a forecast of loss

Different financial categories; may overlap and are never added together. All figures are simulated.

What doesn't add up?

Sales forecast

Healthy growth pipeline

Delivery capacity

Limited sustainable staff capacity

Growth may require labor costs missing from the original forecast.

Department budgets

Software spend within limits

Vendor utilization

Capabilities overlap across teams

Budget compliance may mask company-wide savings.

CRM

Customer remains active

Customer experience

Delays, complaints and falling engagement

An active account can still need retention attention.

Neither source must be wrong. The tension becomes visible when their information is considered together.