Big Leap

Powered by Decidian Intelligence

Simulated business data | Decidian intelligence demonstration DEMONSTRATION MODE — SAVED RESULTS
Start Big Leap demoBig Leap ERP viewConnectionEvidence ExplorerOwner decisions

Decidian financial intelligence · Simulated data

Show me how Decidian found this

DEC-FIN-015 · REVENUE LEAKAGE / MARGIN EXPOSURE

Simulated demonstration data

Delayed collections

Decision: What supports delayed collections?

Financial impact

$48,000

Annualized

Evidence

Additional Verification Needed

19 source records

Recommendation

Validate the supporting records and evaluate a targeted delayed collections improvement before committing.

Assumptions, risks & what would change the recommendation

Assumptions

  • Overdue balance × expected loss rate by age (1% / 5% / 30%)
  • Original baseline assumptions; revised scenarios do not overwrite this finding
  • Related opportunities may overlap and must not be added without deductions

Key risks

  • Customer or team disruption
  • Implementation costs may exceed benefit
  • Assumed improvements may not be realized

Would change it

  • Existing contracts or operational requirements may explain the apparent gap
  • Realization rates require a measured pilot
Stress-test this decision Full evidence

A · The Discovery · Original Finding

$48,000

Revenue leakage / margin exposure · Annualized

SIMULATED DEMONSTRATIONAdditional Verification Needed
Finding ID
DEC-FIN-015
Dataset version
BL-DEMO-2026-10-V1
Analysis timestamp · UTC
2026-10-28T18:10:00Z
Calculation version
BL-FIN-V1

Accounts receivable · Financial planning

The Business Question

What supports delayed collections?

B · What the ERP Shows

ERP / CRM

Accounts, commitments and activity are recorded

Accounting

Revenue and recurring costs are tracked

Operational records

Delivery, usage and collection records add context

C · What Decidian Connects

Accounts receivableFinancial planningFinancial calculation

19 fictional source records · stable identifiers

View detailed evidence
Record IDSource systemOriginal values
AR-001Accounts receivable
amount:
67,500
client Id:
CL-0089
days Overdue:
55
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-002Accounts receivable
amount:
34,500
client Id:
CL-0042
days Overdue:
40
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-003Accounts receivable
amount:
45,500
client Id:
CL-0120
days Overdue:
42
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-004Accounts receivable
amount:
37,500
client Id:
CL-0027
days Overdue:
38
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-005Accounts receivable
amount:
67,500
client Id:
CL-0090
days Overdue:
54
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-006Accounts receivable
amount:
33,500
client Id:
CL-0039
days Overdue:
38
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-007Accounts receivable
amount:
74,500
client Id:
CL-0068
days Overdue:
37
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-008Accounts receivable
amount:
29,500
client Id:
CL-0048
days Overdue:
35
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-009Accounts receivable
amount:
10,000
client Id:
CL-0060
days Overdue:
39
assumed Loss Rate:
0.01
AR-010Accounts receivable
amount:
10,000
client Id:
CL-0060
days Overdue:
75
assumed Loss Rate:
0.05
AR-011Accounts receivable
amount:
72,500
client Id:
CL-0095
days Overdue:
67
assumed Loss Rate:
0.05
AR-012Accounts receivable
amount:
15,000
client Id:
CL-0090
days Overdue:
74
assumed Loss Rate:
0.05
AR-013Accounts receivable
amount:
10,000
client Id:
CL-0070
days Overdue:
66
assumed Loss Rate:
0.05
AR-014Accounts receivable
amount:
52,500
client Id:
CL-0024
days Overdue:
81
assumed Loss Rate:
0.05
AR-015Accounts receivable
amount:
25,000
client Id:
CL-0030
days Overdue:
92
assumed Loss Rate:
0.3
AR-016Accounts receivable
amount:
12,000
client Id:
CL-0030
days Overdue:
91
assumed Loss Rate:
0.3
AR-017Accounts receivable
amount:
47,000
client Id:
CL-0061
days Overdue:
96
assumed Loss Rate:
0.3
AR-018Accounts receivable
amount:
36,000
client Id:
CL-0071
days Overdue:
94
assumed Loss Rate:
0.3
FM-LK-5Financial planning
baseline Revenue:
12,800,000
clients:
125
employees:
72
avg Client Revenue:
102,400
target Utilization:
0.8

D · What Decidian Discovers

Delayed collections becomes visible when operating records are considered alongside financial assumptions.

Additional Verification Needed

E · Financial Calculation

$48,000

Revenue leakage / margin exposure · Annualized

Overdue balance × expected loss rate by age (1% / 5% / 30%)

Baseline decision: Implement targeted improvement

Implementation: $20,000

Modeled first-year net benefit: $5,200

Ongoing annualized benefit: $33,600

Original financial impact is not itself a guaranteed net benefit. Timing, realization and implementation are modeled separately.

Assumptions

  • Overdue balance × expected loss rate by age (1% / 5% / 30%)
  • Original baseline assumptions; revised scenarios do not overwrite this finding
  • Related opportunities may overlap and must not be added without deductions

F · Recommendation

Validate the supporting records and evaluate a targeted delayed collections improvement before committing.

G · Risks and Trade-Offs

  • Customer or team disruption
  • Implementation costs may exceed benefit
  • Assumed improvements may not be realized

What Could Change This Conclusion?

  • Existing contracts or operational requirements may explain the apparent gap
  • Realization rates require a measured pilot

H · Next Decision

TEST THIS DECISION

Optional review sends these fictional records to the existing Decidian connection; it may take 1–2 minutes.

All findings
Three departments are paying for overlapping softwareVendor charges may not match contract termsTechnology spending is growing faster than usageAdditional client work is reducing profitabilityStrong campaign metrics can hide low-profit customersRevenue growth is not translating into cash at the same rateRevenue growth is masking declining profitabilityRenewal timing can lock in unnecessary costSales growth forecasts conflict with delivery capacityActive accounts can still need retention attentionHigh-intent leads have slower follow-upUnderperforming client contractsSoftware & vendor wasteSales-to-operations misalignmentDelayed collectionsContract pricing optimizationImproved sales conversionClient retention improvementsResource utilization improvements

Money you could save

$286K

Gross avoidable annual expenses before timing and costs

Money you may be losing

$420K

Unbilled delivery-cost exposure, within $780K total leakage

Money you could make

$1.24M

Gross existing financial opportunities before overlap and realization

Money at risk

$840K

Annual contract revenue exposed, not a forecast of loss

Different financial categories; may overlap and are never added together. All figures are simulated.

What doesn't add up?

Sales forecast

Healthy growth pipeline

Delivery capacity

Limited sustainable staff capacity

Growth may require labor costs missing from the original forecast.

Department budgets

Software spend within limits

Vendor utilization

Capabilities overlap across teams

Budget compliance may mask company-wide savings.

CRM

Customer remains active

Customer experience

Delays, complaints and falling engagement

An active account can still need retention attention.

Neither source must be wrong. The tension becomes visible when their information is considered together.

Powered by Decidian Intelligence