Simulated business data | Decidian intelligence demonstration DEMONSTRATION MODE — SAVED RESULTS

Start Big Leap demo Big Leap ERP view Connection Evidence Explorer Owner decisions

Decidian financial intelligence · Simulated data

Show me how Decidian found this

DEC-FIN-006 · INCREMENTAL PROFIT OPPORTUNITY

Simulated demonstration data

Sales growth forecasts conflict with delivery capacity

Decision: Can staffing deliver forecast growth without eroding margin?

Financial impact

$292,823

Annualized

Evidence

Additional Verification Needed

14 source records

Recommendation

Validate capacity and labor costs before committing to full growth.

Assumptions, risks & what would change the recommendation

Assumptions

Fictional records are internally consistent; validate real contracts and usage before acting

Key risks

Hiring ahead of demand
Service delays

Would change it

Planned hiring is not included in current capacity
Forecast sales may not materialize

Stress-test this decision Full evidence

A · The Discovery · Original Finding

$292,823

Incremental profit opportunity · Annualized

SIMULATED DEMONSTRATIONAdditional Verification Needed

Finding ID: DEC-FIN-006
Dataset version: BL-DEMO-2026-10-V1
Analysis timestamp · UTC: 2026-10-28T18:10:00Z
Calculation version: BL-FIN-V1

CRM · Time tracking / Payroll · Projects

The Business Question

Can staffing deliver forecast growth without eroding margin?

B · What the ERP Shows

CRM

Pipeline healthy

Projects

Commitments growing

Time tracking / Payroll

Limited spare capacity

C · What Decidian Connects

PipelineDelivery commitmentsStaff utilizationHiring / overtimeIncremental profit

14 fictional source records · stable identifiers

View detailed evidence

Record ID	Source system	Original values
PL-1	CRM	prospect: Vantage Pet Care stage: Discovery value: 18,000
PL-2	CRM	prospect: Willowbrook Law stage: Proposal value: 17,000
PL-3	CRM	prospect: Yarrow Skincare stage: Negotiation value: 78,000
PL-4	CRM	prospect: Zephyr Freight stage: Verbal value: 35,000
PL-5	CRM	prospect: Northgate Academy stage: Discovery value: 37,000
EM-001	Time tracking / Payroll	salary: 86,000 utilization: 0.75 billable Hours: 1,349
EM-002	Time tracking / Payroll	salary: 89,000 utilization: 0.76 billable Hours: 1,362
EM-003	Time tracking / Payroll	salary: 82,000 utilization: 0.79 billable Hours: 1,415
EM-004	Time tracking / Payroll	salary: 68,000 utilization: 0.78 billable Hours: 1,403
EM-005	Time tracking / Payroll	salary: 101,000 utilization: 0.88 billable Hours: 1,581
EM-006	Time tracking / Payroll	salary: 85,000 utilization: 0.76 billable Hours: 1,367
EM-007	Time tracking / Payroll	salary: 94,000 utilization: 0.59 billable Hours: 1,054
EM-008	Time tracking / Payroll	salary: 96,000 utilization: 0.76 billable Hours: 1,362
CAP-PLAN	Projects	growth: 0.18 needed Hours: 18,252.8 spare Hours: 7,776 hires: 6

D · What Decidian Discovers

Growth consumes more hours than spare staffing can provide. Hiring and overtime reduce contribution.

Additional Verification Needed

E · Financial Calculation

$292,823

Incremental profit opportunity · Annualized

Added revenue × delivery ratio / cost per hour = required hours. Use spare capacity, limited premium overtime, then hires; deduct other delivery costs to estimate profit.

Baseline decision: Alternative: cap growth at ~10%

Implementation: $20,000

Modeled first-year net benefit: $164,015

Ongoing annualized benefit: $245,354

Original financial impact is not itself a guaranteed net benefit. Timing, realization and implementation are modeled separately.

Assumptions

Fictional records are internally consistent; validate real contracts and usage before acting

F · Recommendation

Validate capacity and labor costs before committing to full growth.

G · Risks and Trade-Offs

Hiring ahead of demand
Service delays

What Could Change This Conclusion?

Planned hiring is not included in current capacity
Forecast sales may not materialize

H · Next Decision

TEST THIS DECISION

Optional review sends these fictional records to the existing Decidian connection; it may take 1–2 minutes.

All findings

Three departments are paying for overlapping software Vendor charges may not match contract terms Technology spending is growing faster than usage Additional client work is reducing profitability Strong campaign metrics can hide low-profit customers Revenue growth is not translating into cash at the same rate Revenue growth is masking declining profitability Renewal timing can lock in unnecessary cost Sales growth forecasts conflict with delivery capacity Active accounts can still need retention attention High-intent leads have slower follow-up Underperforming client contracts Software & vendor waste Sales-to-operations misalignment Delayed collections Contract pricing optimization Improved sales conversion Client retention improvements Resource utilization improvements

Money you could save

$286K

Gross avoidable annual expenses before timing and costs

Money you may be losing

$420K

Unbilled delivery-cost exposure, within $780K total leakage

Money you could make

$1.24M

Gross existing financial opportunities before overlap and realization

Money at risk

$840K

Annual contract revenue exposed, not a forecast of loss

Different financial categories; may overlap and are never added together. All figures are simulated.

What doesn't add up?

Sales forecast

Healthy growth pipeline

Delivery capacity

Limited sustainable staff capacity

Growth may require labor costs missing from the original forecast.

Department budgets

Software spend within limits

Vendor utilization

Capabilities overlap across teams

Budget compliance may mask company-wide savings.

CRM

Customer remains active

Customer experience

Delays, complaints and falling engagement

An active account can still need retention attention.

Neither source must be wrong. The tension becomes visible when their information is considered together.