Big Leap

Powered by Decidian Intelligence

Simulated business data | Decidian intelligence demonstration DEMONSTRATION MODE — SAVED RESULTS
Start Big Leap demoBig Leap ERP viewConnectionEvidence ExplorerOwner decisions

Decidian financial intelligence · Simulated data

Show me how Decidian found this

DEC-FIN-009 · MODELED TOTAL OPERATING PROFIT

Simulated demonstration data

Revenue growth is masking declining profitability

Decision: Does the growth plan improve profit after delivery costs?

Financial impact

$280,240

First-year modeled profit · not incremental benefit

Evidence

Additional Verification Needed

24 source records

Recommendation

Prioritize profitable customer segments, pricing and delivery efficiency before accelerating acquisition.

Assumptions, risks & what would change the recommendation

Assumptions

  • Fictional records are internally consistent; validate real contracts and usage before acting

Key risks

  • Slower growth
  • Client resistance to pricing
  • Execution cost

Would change it

  • Planned hiring may change capacity
  • One-off delivery problems may not recur
Stress-test this decision Full evidence

A · The Discovery · Original Finding

$280,240

Modeled total operating profit · First-year modeled profit · not incremental benefit

SIMULATED DEMONSTRATIONAdditional Verification Needed
Finding ID
DEC-FIN-009
Dataset version
BL-DEMO-2026-10-V1
Analysis timestamp · UTC
2026-10-28T18:10:00Z
Calculation version
BL-FIN-V1

ERP / Accounting · Payroll · Time tracking · Project accounting

The Business Question

Does the growth plan improve profit after delivery costs?

B · What the ERP Shows

ERP / CRM

Revenue growing; pipeline healthy

Accounting

Operating margins declining

Projects

Delivery hours increasing

Payroll

Overtime rising

C · What Decidian Connects

Revenue trendDelivery effortPayroll / overtimeSegment marginGrowth strategy

24 fictional source records · stable identifiers

View detailed evidence
Record IDSource systemOriginal values
FM-01ERP / Accounting
month:
Nov
revenue:
986,044.9
operating Profit:
168,027.86
margin:
0.17
operating Expense:
818,017.05
FM-02ERP / Accounting
month:
Dec
revenue:
1,000,021.49
operating Profit:
165,397.5
margin:
0.17
operating Expense:
834,623.99
FM-03ERP / Accounting
month:
Jan
revenue:
1,014,196.19
operating Profit:
162,658.82
margin:
0.16
operating Expense:
851,537.37
FM-04ERP / Accounting
month:
Feb
revenue:
1,028,571.81
operating Profit:
159,809.28
margin:
0.16
operating Expense:
868,762.53
FM-05ERP / Accounting
month:
Mar
revenue:
1,043,151.2
operating Profit:
156,846.27
margin:
0.15
operating Expense:
886,304.93
FM-06ERP / Accounting
month:
Apr
revenue:
1,057,937.23
operating Profit:
153,767.15
margin:
0.15
operating Expense:
904,170.08
FM-07ERP / Accounting
month:
May
revenue:
1,072,932.85
operating Profit:
150,569.24
margin:
0.14
operating Expense:
922,363.62
FM-08ERP / Accounting
month:
Jun
revenue:
1,088,141.03
operating Profit:
147,249.77
margin:
0.14
operating Expense:
940,891.26
FM-09ERP / Accounting
month:
Jul
revenue:
1,103,564.77
operating Profit:
143,805.95
margin:
0.13
operating Expense:
959,758.82
FM-10ERP / Accounting
month:
Aug
revenue:
1,119,207.13
operating Profit:
140,234.91
margin:
0.13
operating Expense:
978,972.22
FM-11ERP / Accounting
month:
Sep
revenue:
1,135,071.22
operating Profit:
136,533.75
margin:
0.12
operating Expense:
998,537.46
FM-12ERP / Accounting
month:
Oct
revenue:
1,151,160.17
operating Profit:
132,699.49
margin:
0.12
operating Expense:
1,018,460.67
EM-001Payroll
salary:
86,000
team:
Client Services
utilization:
0.75
EM-002Payroll
salary:
89,000
team:
SEO
utilization:
0.76
EM-003Payroll
salary:
82,000
team:
Paid Media
utilization:
0.79
EM-004Payroll
salary:
68,000
team:
Content
utilization:
0.78
EM-005Payroll
salary:
101,000
team:
Web
utilization:
0.88
EM-006Payroll
salary:
85,000
team:
Creative
utilization:
0.76
EM-007Payroll
salary:
94,000
team:
Analytics
utilization:
0.59
EM-008Payroll
salary:
96,000
team:
Delivery
utilization:
0.76
CAP-OVERTIMETime tracking
current Hours:
2,900
prior Hours:
1,700
CL-0016Project accounting
annual Revenue:
361,200
actual Hours:
3,455
contribution Margin:
0.23
CL-0003Project accounting
annual Revenue:
44,400
actual Hours:
1,107
contribution Margin:
-0.99
CL-0124Project accounting
annual Revenue:
40,800
actual Hours:
862
contribution Margin:
-0.69

D · What Decidian Discovers

Monthly operating margins trend downward while scope effort and overtime rise. Correlation supports investigation, not a causal guarantee.

Additional Verification Needed

E · Financial Calculation

$280,240

Modeled total operating profit · First-year modeled profit · not incremental benefit

Monthly margin = operating profit / revenue. Segment contribution = contract revenue − delivery expense. Compare growth/profitability/balanced strategies through the existing financial model, including implementation and downside effects.

Baseline decision: Maintain current approach

Implementation: $0

Modeled first-year net benefit: $0

Ongoing annualized benefit: $0

Original financial impact is not itself a guaranteed net benefit. Timing, realization and implementation are modeled separately.

Assumptions

  • Fictional records are internally consistent; validate real contracts and usage before acting

F · Recommendation

Prioritize profitable customer segments, pricing and delivery efficiency before accelerating acquisition.

G · Risks and Trade-Offs

  • Slower growth
  • Client resistance to pricing
  • Execution cost

What Could Change This Conclusion?

  • Planned hiring may change capacity
  • One-off delivery problems may not recur

H · Next Decision

TEST THIS DECISION

Optional review sends these fictional records to the existing Decidian connection; it may take 1–2 minutes.

All findings
Three departments are paying for overlapping softwareVendor charges may not match contract termsTechnology spending is growing faster than usageAdditional client work is reducing profitabilityStrong campaign metrics can hide low-profit customersRevenue growth is not translating into cash at the same rateRevenue growth is masking declining profitabilityRenewal timing can lock in unnecessary costSales growth forecasts conflict with delivery capacityActive accounts can still need retention attentionHigh-intent leads have slower follow-upUnderperforming client contractsSoftware & vendor wasteSales-to-operations misalignmentDelayed collectionsContract pricing optimizationImproved sales conversionClient retention improvementsResource utilization improvements

Money you could save

$286K

Gross avoidable annual expenses before timing and costs

Money you may be losing

$420K

Unbilled delivery-cost exposure, within $780K total leakage

Money you could make

$1.24M

Gross existing financial opportunities before overlap and realization

Money at risk

$840K

Annual contract revenue exposed, not a forecast of loss

Different financial categories; may overlap and are never added together. All figures are simulated.

What doesn't add up?

Sales forecast

Healthy growth pipeline

Delivery capacity

Limited sustainable staff capacity

Growth may require labor costs missing from the original forecast.

Department budgets

Software spend within limits

Vendor utilization

Capabilities overlap across teams

Budget compliance may mask company-wide savings.

CRM

Customer remains active

Customer experience

Delays, complaints and falling engagement

An active account can still need retention attention.

Neither source must be wrong. The tension becomes visible when their information is considered together.

Powered by Decidian Intelligence