Simulated business data | Decidian intelligence demonstration DEMONSTRATION MODE — SAVED RESULTS

Start Big Leap demo Big Leap ERP view Connection Evidence Explorer Owner decisions

Decidian financial intelligence · Simulated data

Show me how Decidian found this

DEC-FIN-013 · REVENUE LEAKAGE / MARGIN EXPOSURE

Simulated demonstration data

Software & vendor waste

Decision: What supports software & vendor waste?

Financial impact

$96,000

Annualized

Evidence

Additional Verification Needed

11 source records

Recommendation

Validate the supporting records and evaluate a targeted software & vendor waste improvement before committing.

Assumptions, risks & what would change the recommendation

Assumptions

Unused seats × seat price × 12, plus full cost of overlapping tools
Original baseline assumptions; revised scenarios do not overwrite this finding
Related opportunities may overlap and must not be added without deductions

Key risks

Customer or team disruption
Implementation costs may exceed benefit
Assumed improvements may not be realized

Would change it

Existing contracts or operational requirements may explain the apparent gap
Realization rates require a measured pilot

Stress-test this decision Full evidence

A · The Discovery · Original Finding

$96,000

Revenue leakage / margin exposure · Annualized

SIMULATED DEMONSTRATIONAdditional Verification Needed

Finding ID: DEC-FIN-013
Dataset version: BL-DEMO-2026-10-V1
Analysis timestamp · UTC: 2026-10-28T18:10:00Z
Calculation version: BL-FIN-V1

Accounting / Software usage · Financial planning

The Business Question

What supports software & vendor waste?

B · What the ERP Shows

ERP / CRM

Accounts, commitments and activity are recorded

Accounting

Revenue and recurring costs are tracked

Operational records

Delivery, usage and collection records add context

C · What Decidian Connects

Accounting / Software usageFinancial planningFinancial calculation

11 fictional source records · stable identifiers

View detailed evidence

Record ID	Source system	Original values
SW-01	Accounting / Software usage	tool: ProjectFlow seats: 80 active Seats: 68 waste: 4,320 overlaps With: None
SW-02	Accounting / Software usage	tool: TaskGrid seats: 40 active Seats: 12 waste: 12,000 overlaps With: ProjectFlow
SW-03	Accounting / Software usage	tool: RankLens seats: 25 active Seats: 22 waste: 3,600 overlaps With: None
SW-04	Accounting / Software usage	tool: SerpScope seats: 15 active Seats: 6 waste: 16,200 overlaps With: RankLens
SW-05	Accounting / Software usage	tool: AdPilot seats: 20 active Seats: 18 waste: 3,360 overlaps With: None
SW-06	Accounting / Software usage	tool: DesignSuite seats: 30 active Seats: 21 waste: 6,480 overlaps With: None
SW-07	Accounting / Software usage	tool: ChatHub seats: 90 active Seats: 80 waste: 1,800 overlaps With: None
SW-08	Accounting / Software usage	tool: ReportForge seats: 35 active Seats: 30 waste: 4,800 overlaps With: None
SW-09	Accounting / Software usage	tool: DataPipe seats: 10 active Seats: 4 waste: 14,400 overlaps With: None
SW-11	Accounting / Software usage	tool: MotionKit seats: 22 active Seats: 10 waste: 29,040 overlaps With: DesignSuite
FM-LK-3	Financial planning	baseline Revenue: 12,800,000 clients: 125 employees: 72 avg Client Revenue: 102,400 target Utilization: 0.8

D · What Decidian Discovers

Software & vendor waste becomes visible when operating records are considered alongside financial assumptions.

Additional Verification Needed

E · Financial Calculation

$96,000

Revenue leakage / margin exposure · Annualized

Unused seats × seat price × 12, plus full cost of overlapping tools

Baseline decision: Implement targeted improvement

Implementation: $20,000

Modeled first-year net benefit: $30,400

Ongoing annualized benefit: $67,200

Original financial impact is not itself a guaranteed net benefit. Timing, realization and implementation are modeled separately.

Assumptions

Unused seats × seat price × 12, plus full cost of overlapping tools
Original baseline assumptions; revised scenarios do not overwrite this finding
Related opportunities may overlap and must not be added without deductions

F · Recommendation

Validate the supporting records and evaluate a targeted software & vendor waste improvement before committing.

G · Risks and Trade-Offs

Customer or team disruption
Implementation costs may exceed benefit
Assumed improvements may not be realized

What Could Change This Conclusion?

Existing contracts or operational requirements may explain the apparent gap
Realization rates require a measured pilot

H · Next Decision

TEST THIS DECISION

Optional review sends these fictional records to the existing Decidian connection; it may take 1–2 minutes.

All findings

Three departments are paying for overlapping software Vendor charges may not match contract terms Technology spending is growing faster than usage Additional client work is reducing profitability Strong campaign metrics can hide low-profit customers Revenue growth is not translating into cash at the same rate Revenue growth is masking declining profitability Renewal timing can lock in unnecessary cost Sales growth forecasts conflict with delivery capacity Active accounts can still need retention attention High-intent leads have slower follow-up Underperforming client contracts Software & vendor waste Sales-to-operations misalignment Delayed collections Contract pricing optimization Improved sales conversion Client retention improvements Resource utilization improvements

Money you could save

$286K

Gross avoidable annual expenses before timing and costs

Money you may be losing

$420K

Unbilled delivery-cost exposure, within $780K total leakage

Money you could make

$1.24M

Gross existing financial opportunities before overlap and realization

Money at risk

$840K

Annual contract revenue exposed, not a forecast of loss

Different financial categories; may overlap and are never added together. All figures are simulated.

What doesn't add up?

Sales forecast

Healthy growth pipeline

Delivery capacity

Limited sustainable staff capacity

Growth may require labor costs missing from the original forecast.

Department budgets

Software spend within limits

Vendor utilization

Capabilities overlap across teams

Budget compliance may mask company-wide savings.

CRM

Customer remains active

Customer experience

Delays, complaints and falling engagement

An active account can still need retention attention.

Neither source must be wrong. The tension becomes visible when their information is considered together.